1 |
On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 01:53:45PM -0500, Dale wrote: |
2 |
> Nikos Chantziaras wrote: |
3 |
> > […] |
4 |
> > If your system is on, how is it going to replace vulnerable kernels |
5 |
> > with patched ones? |
6 |
|
7 |
> […] |
8 |
> |
9 |
> While I want to keep the bad CPU code from being used, they first have |
10 |
> to get past other things. My DSL modem has protections, my router adds |
11 |
> yet another layer of it. I use adblock, noscript and such on all my |
12 |
> browsers as well. |
13 |
|
14 |
I’m kinda on the same train of thought. All those vulnerabilities of recent |
15 |
years are about data exfiltration through cross-process memory reads or |
16 |
exploitation of caching mechanisms for instruction optimisations. The threat |
17 |
scenario is mostly relevant for servers which run unverified processes of |
18 |
any number of users which may be trying to attack other users’ processes. |
19 |
|
20 |
On a personal computer, nowadays the most common point of entry for malware |
21 |
is the browser (or a manipulated data file for any kind of parser bug such |
22 |
as Adobe or M$ Office). And in the browser, the threat comes from active |
23 |
elements, IOW, Ecma Script. I use uMatrix with strict defaults, scripts are |
24 |
only enabled when actually needed. And opposed to often-heard street talk, |
25 |
you can still use many corners of the Web without JS in many cases. |
26 |
And of course I don’t blindly extract any ace archive that pretends to be a |
27 |
rar. |
28 |
|
29 |
Linux doesn’t “support” Windows crapware, and as long as you are careful |
30 |
about where you get your programs from (i.e. package manager and other |
31 |
trustworthy sources), you are reasonably safe, as opposed from Joe |
32 |
Average-Windows-User who loads Adobe Reader and Google Chrome from |
33 |
free-full-version-software.com instead of the developer’s official website |
34 |
because he simply doesn’t know any better. |
35 |
|
36 |
So I might not be as safe as technically possible, but right now I’m grown |
37 |
tired of following which fix incurs what performance penalty and don’t |
38 |
really give a crap. I set mitigations=off to my cmdline and watch the Tech |
39 |
media burn itself down in a spiral of hysteria. In the meantime I protect |
40 |
myself by (hopefully) knowing what each of my actions does and by using |
41 |
software that uses common sense and provides a small attack surface, for |
42 |
example mutt and vim instead of HTML mail and a text editor based on an |
43 |
entire browser engine. |
44 |
|
45 |
At some point in the future, my stationary PC will require a hardware |
46 |
refresh. At that point I will say goodbye to Intel. This is the only |
47 |
language companies understand. They’ve been getting ahead by developing |
48 |
features without due diligence and by cutting corners. And this is biting |
49 |
them in their behind now all the way back. |
50 |
|
51 |
-- |
52 |
Gruß | Greetings | Qapla’ |
53 |
Please do not share anything from, with or about me on any social network. |
54 |
|
55 |
There is only one way to the lung and it must be tarred. |