| 1 |
On 23/07/13 09:54, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 23/07/13 08:43, Samuli Suominen wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On 23/07/13 00:46, Mark David Dumlao wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> This would be a lot less of an issue if someone just wrote a logind |
| 5 |
>>> ebuild (wink wink) that provides consolekit like it was originally |
| 6 |
>>> intended. |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
>> not possible, logind since systemd >= 205 requires systemd and won't |
| 9 |
>> work on openrc, upstart, and such |
| 10 |
>> as in, the idea of using logind outside of systemd is a dead end |
| 11 |
>> |
| 12 |
>> so keeping ConsoleKit in portage for long as it works for long as we |
| 13 |
>> need openrc for Linux based systems |
| 14 |
>> and when it no longer works, the contingency plan is to ship vendor |
| 15 |
>> based polkit files that possibly either restore 'plugdev' group or |
| 16 |
>> provide similar groups to ArchLinux like 'network', 'storage', 'power' |
| 17 |
>> to split up the old 'plugdev' |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> Wouldn't it be better to switch to systemd instead? |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
sure, I'm all for systemd but it's not the default yet... or rather, not |
| 22 |
tested enough to be the contigency plans. need to have contigency plans. :) |
Archives