| 1 |
On Friday 16 May 2014 17:30:06 Alan McKinnon wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> There's nothing special about E anymore, it isn't package.masked, it's |
| 4 |
> simply keyworded ~amd64 ~arm ~x86 |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Are you running amd64 or ~amd64? |
| 7 |
> Do you have some local package.mask blocking e17? |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
I'm running amd64 with the odd exception (like enlightenment) and I have no |
| 10 |
enlightenment related masks set up. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
> Here's my setting that work for me: |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> $ grep ACCEPT_KEYWORDS /etc/portage/make.conf |
| 15 |
> ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~amd64" |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> $ grep enlightenment /var/lib/portage/world |
| 18 |
> x11-wm/enlightenment |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> $ grep -ir enlightenment /etc/portage |
| 21 |
> /etc/portage/package.mask/package.mask:x11-wm/enlightenment:0 |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Ahh! You have masked SLOT :0 to stop e16 being pulled in. I thought that |
| 24 |
this would be achievable somehow, merely by keywording SLOT :0.17, but without |
| 25 |
masking e16. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
Regards, |
| 29 |
Mick |
Archives