| 1 |
On Sunday 31 Jul 2016 18:52:23 Fernando Rodriguez wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
--->8 |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
> Just out of curiosity what are the differences between the original genlop |
| 6 |
> calculation and yours, and how long did it actually take? and what is the |
| 7 |
> output of 'genlop -t <cat/pkg>'. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
$ genlop -t gcc -f /mnt/rescue/var/log/emerge.log |
| 10 |
using logfile /mnt/rescue/var/log/emerge.log |
| 11 |
* sys-devel/gcc |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Sat Apr 16 10:07:24 2016 >>> sys-devel/gcc-4.9.3 |
| 14 |
merge time: 25 minutes and 41 seconds. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Sun May 15 10:03:34 2016 >>> sys-devel/gcc-4.9.3 |
| 17 |
merge time: 12 minutes and 19 seconds. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Sun Jul 31 11:33:57 2016 >>> sys-devel/gcc-4.9.3 |
| 20 |
merge time: 17 minutes and 58 seconds. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
This is a fairly new box, so there aren't many records yet. The last one |
| 23 |
above is the one I was talking about. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
I can't tell you how long I thought it would take - sorry. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
> I think it would be inaccurate in most cases (at least it is for me) but |
| 28 |
> if you think the calculation is wrong you should file a bug. For me it |
| 29 |
> seems reasonably accurate por packages with consistent build times. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
Just those three samples are enough to confirm the inaccuracy, but I don't |
| 32 |
really expect anything much better given all the factors we've mentioned. |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
I was just curious. Thanks for your interest though. |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
-- |
| 37 |
Rgds |
| 38 |
Peter |
Archives