Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: tar a brand new Gentoo install to a USB drive for safe keeping?
Date: Tue, 06 May 2008 21:33:42
Message-Id: 20080506223334.1baf6612@loonquawl.digimed.co.uk
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] Re: tar a brand new Gentoo install to a USB drive for safe keeping? by Michael Schmarck
1 On Tue, 06 May 2008 14:40:08 +0200, Michael Schmarck wrote:
2
3 > > That hasn't been needed for a long time. Tar is able to detect bzip2
4 > > and gzip compression and handle it automatically.
5 >
6 > That's only true for GNU tar. If you're also dealing with other
7 > systems where you might not have GNU tar, you might be "surprised"
8 > to find that "tar xvf file.tgz" doesn't work.
9
10 However, this thread is specifically about using tar on /Gentoo, which
11 does use GNU tar.
12
13 > Hence I think, that it is a good idea to keep on using z or j.
14
15 That really depends on the level of portability your scripts need. Using
16 z or j is more portable, but also more complex for scripting.
17
18
19 --
20 Neil Bothwick
21
22 Top Oxymorons Number 46: Found missing

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-user] Re: Re: tar a brand new Gentoo install to a USB drive for safe keeping? Michael Schmarck <michael.schmarck@×××××××××××××.de>