1 |
I still think you need to partition the new drive first, then |
2 |
dd the individual partitions. |
3 |
|
4 |
Addresses within partitions are normally handled as sector offsets, but |
5 |
booting and locating the start/extent of partitions don't always. |
6 |
|
7 |
The fdisk format on PCs is ancient and predates SCSI (and IDE drives that |
8 |
pretend to be SCSI). It encodes addresses in terms of sector/head/cylinder, |
9 |
as well as storing block offset information. |
10 |
|
11 |
Unless the old and new drives are identical geometry (for example, |
12 |
the same make and model) then any code that tries to use physical |
13 |
addressing based on geometry is going to screw up if the fdisk table |
14 |
does not match the drive... |
15 |
|
16 |
Regards, |
17 |
DigbyT |
18 |
|
19 |
On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 04:54:57PM -0800, maxim wexler wrote: |
20 |
> |
21 |
> boots into a panic. Here's the last 5 lines: |
22 |
> |
23 |
> [28.856347] ReiserFS: sda3: found reiserfs format |
24 |
> "3.6" with standard journal |
25 |
> [31.560835] ReiserFS: sda3: warning: sh-2029: reiserfs |
26 |
> read_bitmaps: bitmap bitlock(#14057372) reading failed |
27 |
> [31.663418] UDF-fs: No partition found (1) |
28 |
> [31.663466] Kernel panic - not syncing: VFS: Unable to |
29 |
> mount root fs on unknown-block(8,3) |
30 |
> [31.663493] |
31 |
> |
32 |
> After dd'ing I compared both drives w/fdisk and they |
33 |
> were identical except for the device names, of course. |
34 |
> I *did* update fstab and grub.conf and ran |
35 |
> grub-install w/o error. Don't know why it was looking |
36 |
> for a UDF fs. |
37 |
> |
38 |
> one thing I noticed though, the SATA drive is about 3M |
39 |
> smaller than the ATA. |
40 |
> |
41 |
-- |
42 |
Digby R. S. Tarvin digbyt@××××××.com |
43 |
http://www.digbyt.com |
44 |
-- |
45 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |