| 1 |
wabe <wabenbau <at> gmail.com> writes: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> waltdnes <at> waltdnes.org wrote: |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
> I'm glad that gentoo users still have an alternative to systemd, and |
| 8 |
> hope that this will also be the case in future. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Non Systemd has a very bright future. In clustering, Systemd is ok, even |
| 11 |
great for containers. In Hi Performance Computing types of clusters, systemd |
| 12 |
is loosing the battle. Many in these trenches |
| 13 |
believe that the cluster engines of HPC cluster architectures |
| 14 |
will vastly outperform clusters with systemd; thus eventually |
| 15 |
removing systemd from linux clusters where performance is important. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Still, if you manage 1000 linux workstations, then systemd does have |
| 19 |
it's merits. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
> But I really don't wanna start another pro/con systemd thread here! ;-) |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Exactly. I just wanted to encourage the non-systemd folks that their future |
| 25 |
looks very bright. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
> Regards |
| 28 |
> wabe |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
hth, |
| 32 |
James |
Archives