Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Al <oss.elmar@××××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Shared libraries in Gentoo
Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2010 10:29:19
Message-Id: AANLkTinq_LuFrM=L3eeYjdmZRFfpt8DZmYGrW2waJMAF@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Shared libraries in Gentoo by Enrico Weigelt
1 >
2 > When you're going into the autotools hell. Also completely
3 > obsoleted before it even came into existence. A set of well-
4 > designed shell functions could do the job *much* better.
5 >
6
7 While porting to cygwin I can be happy when they use it. For my first
8 impression those libraries are more easy to port. They produce
9 libraries with a *.dll.a suffix like the native libraries of Cygwin.
10
11 The other example is libz. AFAIK it has a manually written configure
12 script. It generates libz.so. bzip2 ends up in error messages until I
13 build it statically.
14
15 I still try to understand the relation of shared libraries and dynamic
16 libraries. I read that dynamic libraries are linked at runtime. I also
17 read, that you can dynamically link againgst a shared as well as
18 against a normal library.
19
20 But isn't a normal library also shared when multiple programs link it
21 at runtime or does shared library mean it is shared in memory (PIC)?
22
23 Al

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Shared libraries in Gentoo Andrea Conti <alyf@××××.net>
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Shared libraries in Gentoo Enrico Weigelt <weigelt@×××××.de>