| 1 |
On Sunday, July 24 at 15:11 (+0100), Stroller said: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> > Well, if you knew what was causing it, then you wouldn't need to |
| 4 |
> report |
| 5 |
> > a bug as you could just fix it yourself :P |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Quite the opposite! |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
Yeah, I was half joking. The point was that not filing a bug because |
| 10 |
you don't know what the problem is is akin having the check engine light |
| 11 |
on your car go on but not taking it in to service because you don't know |
| 12 |
why the check engine light is on. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
As far as diagnostics. You can provide additional information, if they |
| 15 |
ask you and tell you how (the same way you would if you were taking your |
| 16 |
car in). |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
There's really no reason *not* to report something that you know is |
| 19 |
wrong, in my opinion anyway. Even if it's not enough information to fix |
| 20 |
it, at least other people are aware that there is a problem. |
Archives