1 |
On Donnerstag 04 März 2010, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: |
2 |
> On 03/04/2010 08:44 AM, Graham Murray wrote: |
3 |
> > Volker Armin Hemmann<volkerarmin@××××××××××.com> writes: |
4 |
> >> no, it is not safe to have a 64bit only system. Just choose the multilib |
5 |
> >> profile and start installing. If something needs the 32bit emul libs, it |
6 |
> >> will pull the stuff in. There is nothing you need to care about. |
7 |
> > |
8 |
> > What is unsafe about a 64bit only system? Surely if it were unsafe then |
9 |
> > Gentoo would not offer no-multilib profiles? I have recently built 2 |
10 |
> > systems using a no-multilib profile and have not found any problems, and |
11 |
> > expect to start building a third one today. |
12 |
> |
13 |
> You didn't understand the question Volker was replying to. The question |
14 |
> was not about "safe" as in "security", but rather "safe" as in "I can |
15 |
> rest assured that a no-multilib system can run every software I could |
16 |
> install", which is clearly not the case since some applications need |
17 |
> 32-bit support. |
18 |
|
19 |
exactly. As Alan explained, there might be a point where you need to run a |
20 |
32bit app. |
21 |
Maybe some legacy game (Civilization Call To Power comes to mind) or some new- |
22 |
but-the-vendor-sucks software. |
23 |
Without multilib you can either choose not to use that software (which isn't a |
24 |
choice if you really need it) or you can reinstall everything. |
25 |
|
26 |
And all that for a couple of megabytes on a tens, maybe hundreds of gigabytes |
27 |
harddisk. |
28 |
|
29 |
du -h /usr/lib32 |
30 |
362M /usr/lib32 |
31 |
|
32 |
but: |
33 |
rootfs 57G 23G 34G 41% / |
34 |
|
35 |
yeah, shocking. Almost a 114th of the harddisk used for multilib stuff ;) |