| 1 |
On Sunday 17 September 2006 13:53, Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sunday 17 September 2006 13:09, Mick wrote: |
| 3 |
> > I think the OP meant that revdep completes without anything proposed for |
| 4 |
> > remerging, but with a long list of errors reported. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> If that is correct then it means that the OP is seeing old cruft. |
| 7 |
> revdep-rebuild with or without --library isn't going to fix that. Cleaning |
| 8 |
> the old cruft (after checking that it is in fact cruft) is the proper |
| 9 |
> solution for that... |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Yes, all things being equal. But in reality emerges don't always complete |
| 12 |
cleanly when your system crashes half way. Should that be the case |
| 13 |
revdep-rebuild-ing it will ensure that all is put right with regards to |
| 14 |
dependencies before old libs are deleted. |
| 15 |
-- |
| 16 |
Regards, |
| 17 |
Mick |
Archives