1 |
thanks for the explanation. And what about samba project ? it doesn´t use SMB ? |
2 |
|
3 |
|
4 |
On 5/23/06, Richard Fish <bigfish@××××××××××.org> wrote: |
5 |
> On 5/23/06, Allan Spagnol Comar <allan.comar@×××××.com> wrote: |
6 |
> > nice, the bar thing solved the problem with samba, I had never used |
7 |
> > cifs, is it better ? in what things it is better then smbfs ? |
8 |
> |
9 |
> Among other things, it supports files >2G (or is it 4G?). |
10 |
> |
11 |
> From /usr/src/linux/Documentation/filesystems/cifs.txt: |
12 |
> |
13 |
> This is the client VFS module for the Common Internet File System |
14 |
> (CIFS) protocol which is the successor to the Server Message Block |
15 |
> (SMB) protocol, the native file sharing mechanism for most early |
16 |
> PC operating systems. CIFS is fully supported by current network |
17 |
> file servers such as Windows 2000, Windows 2003 (including |
18 |
> Windows XP) as well by Samba (which provides excellent CIFS |
19 |
> server support for Linux and many other operating systems) |
20 |
> <snip> |
21 |
> The intent of this module is to provide the most advanced network |
22 |
> file system function for CIFS compliant servers, including better |
23 |
> POSIX compliance, secure per-user session establishment, high |
24 |
> performance safe distributed caching (oplock), optional packet |
25 |
> signing, large files, Unicode support and other internationalization |
26 |
> improvements. |
27 |
> |
28 |
> In fact I read on lwn.net that smbfs may be officially deprecated |
29 |
> soon...possibly in 2.6.18. |
30 |
> |
31 |
> -Richard |
32 |
> |
33 |
> -- |
34 |
> gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
35 |
> |
36 |
> |
37 |
|
38 |
|
39 |
-- |
40 |
An application asked: |
41 |
"Requeires Windows 9x, NT4 or better", |
42 |
so I´ve installed Linux |
43 |
|
44 |
-- |
45 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |