| 1 |
On Sun, 29 Sep 2013 19:52:30 -0400, Greg Woodbury wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> But I don't *want* to run a genkernel for reasons of my own. |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> I do not *want* to have to have an init* pseudo-filesystem for reasons |
| 6 |
> of my own. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> I may want to have a separate /usr for rrerasons of my own. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
You can have whatever you want, no one is saying otherwise. All the news |
| 11 |
item said was that Gentoo will no longer support such an arrangement. Thy |
| 12 |
are not removing your choice to do it your way, only exercising their |
| 13 |
choice to do things their way. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
> Those claiming that a separate /usr has been broken for a while are, to |
| 16 |
> be blunt, lying. Certain programs and libraries were added or moved to |
| 17 |
> /usr in dirext violation of established practice. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
If you are going to accuse people of lying, you should back it up with |
| 20 |
something more specific than these vague accusations. What programs and |
| 21 |
libraries were moved? Please don't say systemd, as it has already been |
| 22 |
established that this was not forced by systemd and affects systems |
| 23 |
running the Gentoo default of OpenRC. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
Neil Bothwick |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Top Oxymorons Number 5: Twelve-ounce pound cake |
Archives