1 |
On 18/10/14 16:49, James wrote: |
2 |
> Hello, |
3 |
> |
4 |
> |
5 |
> OK, so I run a minimalist DE (LXDE) and htop to monitor |
6 |
> system performance. The mobo has an fx8350 with 8 cores |
7 |
> (currently set at 4GHz (unclocked). The system rarily |
8 |
> uses over 8/32 gig of it's ram. So the resources are not |
9 |
> even close to exhausted. cpus mostly idle. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> I do keep (2) browsers up, with tabs aplenty, but they are not being used |
12 |
> very much. It's mostly a myriad of documents to read while I hack at code. |
13 |
> |
14 |
> Often the latency is minimal and the system response (as guaged) |
15 |
> from the keyboard is fine (quick). Other times the active terminal |
16 |
> session is a pig mostly in the web browser windows. |
17 |
> |
18 |
> So. Is there a make.conf setting or elsewhere to make the |
19 |
> terminal session response times, in the browsers (seamonkey, firefox) |
20 |
> faster? Something like a ram_disk just for the browsers? |
21 |
> |
22 |
> Note, after I finish up a project, many (browser) terminal sessions |
23 |
> are deleted and things are fine again. I'm just asking for a way |
24 |
> to ensure more ram/cpu resources are dedicated to the browsers |
25 |
> to boost performance, on a dynamic basis (without manual intervention). |
26 |
> |
27 |
> Maybe a ram_disk_cache (dynamic renice to-10 for the active window?) just |
28 |
> for the active browser window (the browser window I'm typing in? (background |
29 |
> code compilations are not concurrent with |
30 |
> the typing latency in the browser windows)..... |
31 |
> |
32 |
> ideas? |
33 |
> |
34 |
> |
35 |
> James |
36 |
> |
37 |
> |
38 |
two things you might like to look into: 1. cgroups (including freezer) |
39 |
to help isolate your browsers and also 2. look at atop instead of htop |
40 |
as this includes disk io |