1 |
On Jan 23, 2012 12:10 PM, "Pandu Poluan" <pandu@××××××.info> wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> |
4 |
> On Jan 23, 2012 12:57 AM, "Grant" <emailgrant@×××××.com> wrote: |
5 |
> > |
6 |
> |
7 |
> ----- >8 snip |
8 |
> |
9 |
> > |
10 |
> > Also the MAC indicated in the firewall log is 14 blocks long and the |
11 |
> > local system in question has a MAC address 6 blocks long according to |
12 |
> > ifconfig, but the 6 blocks from ifconfig do match 6 of the blocks |
13 |
> > reported by the firewall. |
14 |
> > |
15 |
> > Does this make sense to anyone? |
16 |
> > |
17 |
> |
18 |
> It's (source MAC):(dest MAC):(payload type) |
19 |
> |
20 |
> (payload type) is usually 08:00 unless you're using SNAP/LLC |
21 |
> |
22 |
> Rgds, |
23 |
|
24 |
Oops, sorry, it's the other way around (dest):(source):(type). |
25 |
|
26 |
It's the representation of the first 14 octets of the Ethernet frame. |
27 |
|
28 |
Rgds, |
29 |
On Jan 23, 2012 12:10 PM, "Pandu Poluan" <pandu@××××××.info> wrote: |
30 |
|
31 |
> |
32 |
> On Jan 23, 2012 12:57 AM, "Grant" <emailgrant@×××××.com> wrote: |
33 |
> > |
34 |
> |
35 |
> ----- >8 snip |
36 |
> |
37 |
> > |
38 |
> > Also the MAC indicated in the firewall log is 14 blocks long and the |
39 |
> > local system in question has a MAC address 6 blocks long according to |
40 |
> > ifconfig, but the 6 blocks from ifconfig do match 6 of the blocks |
41 |
> > reported by the firewall. |
42 |
> > |
43 |
> > Does this make sense to anyone? |
44 |
> > |
45 |
> |
46 |
> It's (source MAC):(dest MAC):(payload type) |
47 |
> |
48 |
> (payload type) is usually 08:00 unless you're using SNAP/LLC |
49 |
> |
50 |
> Rgds, |
51 |
> |