Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Richard Fish <bigfish@××××××××××.org>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: How serious is revdep-rebuild failure
Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2005 18:26:14
Message-Id: 7573e9640511261009w528bab54md27a0b90b3d80887@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] Re: How serious is revdep-rebuild failure by Harry Putnam
1 On 11/26/05, Harry Putnam <reader@×××××××.com> wrote:
2 > Harry Putnam <reader@×××××××.com> writes:
3 >
4 > > Richard Fish <bigfish@××××××××××.org> writes:
5 > >
6 > >> conftest && echo "works"
7 > >
8 > > root # ./conftest && echo "works"
9 > > works
10 > > Seems to have worked as expected.
11 >
12 > Looking at qpkg -v -I|grep gcc
13 > root # qpkg -v -I|grep gcc
14 > sys-devel/gcc-3.3.5.20050130-r1 *
15 > sys-devel/gcc-3.4.4-r1 *
16 > sys-devel/gcc-config-1.3.12-r4 *
17 >
18 > Is it normal to have 2 versions installed?
19
20 Yes. Gcc is slotted, so it is normal to have more than one version installed.
21
22 >
23 > Would a more recent version be likely to solve the cross-compiler
24 > problem?
25
26 3.4.4-r1 is the most recent version available for ~x86.
27
28 The only thing I can think of that might fix it would be an "emerge -e
29 system". But could you post the first 200 lines of
30 /var/tmp/portage/mod_php-4.4.0/work/php-4.4.0/config.log? Maybe there
31 is an answer there...
32
33 -Richard
34
35 --
36 gentoo-user@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-user] Re: How serious is revdep-rebuild failure Harry Putnam <reader@×××××××.com>
[gentoo-user] Re: How serious is revdep-rebuild failure Harry Putnam <reader@×××××××.com>