| 1 |
On Sun, 08 Apr 2007 14:49:20 -0400 |
| 2 |
Mike Edenfield <kutulu@××××××.org> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> Neil Bothwick wrote: |
| 5 |
> > Hello Dan Farrell, |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> >> Why this is the case, I don't think I'll ever understand. White |
| 8 |
> >> terminal backgrounds, aside from the invisible color problem, also |
| 9 |
> >> are hella ugly. |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> > Many people find black on white far easier to read than white on |
| 12 |
> > black, for the same fonts and sizes. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Clearly, though, black on white uses less photons. Think of |
| 15 |
> the children! |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
I don't know, black on a CRt still uses a lot of photons I would |
| 18 |
imagine. In fact, I bet it uses the same amount of power. |
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives