| 1 |
On Tuesday 08 May 2007, Arnau Bria wrote: |
| 2 |
> Ok, but, what is the content of net_dev.patch? |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
It's right there in your original mail: |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
diff -Naur /root/tmp-old/Makefile /root/tmp-new/Makefile |
| 7 |
--- /root/tmp-old/Makefile 2007-01-28 06:41:03.000000000 +0000 |
| 8 |
+++ /root/tmp-new/Makefile 2007-01-28 06:39:54.000000000 +0000 |
| 9 |
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
EXTRA_CFLAGS += -O2 -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -pipe |
| 12 |
#EXTRA_CFLAGS += -Wa,-a,-ad -g |
| 13 |
-EXTRA_CFLAGS += -DZDCONF_WE_STAT_SUPPORT=1 |
| 14 |
+EXTRA_CFLAGS += -DZDCONF_WE_STAT_SUPPORT=0 |
| 15 |
EXTRA_CFLAGS += -DHOST_IF_USB |
| 16 |
EXTRA_CFLAGS += -DAMAC |
| 17 |
EXTRA_CFLAGS += -DGCCK |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
That IS what the patch file looks like. It will alter your Makefile, and |
| 20 |
the epatch function in portage is smart enough to try apply the patch |
| 21 |
to the following files in order: |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
/root/tmp-new/Makefile |
| 24 |
tmp-new/Makefile |
| 25 |
Makefile |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
If that doesn't work, the patch itself is faulty |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
for more info "man patch" |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
alan |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
-- |
| 34 |
Optimists say the glass is half full, |
| 35 |
Pessimists say the glass is half empty, |
| 36 |
Developers say wtf is the glass twice as big as it needs to be? |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
Alan McKinnon |
| 39 |
alan at linuxholdings dot co dot za |
| 40 |
+27 82, double three seven, one nine three five |
| 41 |
-- |
| 42 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives