| 1 |
On Sat, 30 Apr 2016 10:24:43 +0100, Mick wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> Yes, I got (almost) the same and it shows that MICROCODE is a top level |
| 4 |
> module, but I can't see it when I walk through the 'Processor type and |
| 5 |
> features' contents. Fine, my eyesight is not what it used to be, but |
| 6 |
> it can't be this bad! :p |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Symbol: MICROCODE [=n] |
| 9 |
> Type : boolean |
| 10 |
> Prompt: CPU microcode loading support |
| 11 |
> Location: |
| 12 |
> (1) -> Processor type and features |
| 13 |
^ |
| 14 |
> Defined at arch/x86/Kconfig:1125 |
| 15 |
> Depends on: (CPU_SUP_AMD [=y] || CPU_SUP_INTEL [=y]) && |
| 16 |
> BLK_DEV_INITRD Selects: FW_LOADER [=y] |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> I built this 4.4.6 kernel with oldconfig, so it *should* retain |
| 19 |
> previously selected modules, like MICROCODE. Either way, why would it |
| 20 |
> not show in menuconfig, if a search says it is? |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
What happens when you press 1? |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
Neil Bothwick |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
DOS never says "EXCELLENT command or filename"... |
Archives