| 1 |
Philip Webb wrote: |
| 2 |
> I have a lot of images scanned from old negatives of non-standard sizes, |
| 3 |
> which I had to split up into halves or quarters to process; |
| 4 |
> I was careful to use the same settings for each of the sub-parts. |
| 5 |
> Now I want to reassemble them into the original whole pictures. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> There are several apps which might do this. |
| 8 |
> Jonathan Corbet describes using Hugin (LWN 090910); |
| 9 |
> there's also Krita & Gimp & perhaps Imagemagick. |
| 10 |
> I have Imagemagick installed, but the others need a number of deps. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Before I go to a lot of trouble emerging + exploring on my own, |
| 13 |
> has anyone else done this kind of job successfully & what did they use ? |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
I have used hugin but it has been a while. As long as you have enough |
| 18 |
points tied together, it works fine. The more points the better tho. |
| 19 |
It has been updated several times since I used it last so it may be |
| 20 |
better or worse now. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
I have taken as many as 30 pictures and stitched them together. I had |
| 23 |
three rows of 10. It was of a park and it looked great when done. It |
| 24 |
took a couple tries to get it just right but it did a good job and that |
| 25 |
was a good size project. Doing 4 or 5 pictures is pretty easy. Lots of |
| 26 |
overlap is the key tho. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
I don't know of anything else that can do this. GIMP and such might |
| 29 |
could depending on if the image needed some subtle stretching or |
| 30 |
something to fit together. |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
My advice, hugin is likely your best bet. |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
Dale |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
:-) :-) |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
-- |
| 39 |
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or |
| 40 |
how you interpreted my words! |
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
Miss the compile output? Hint: |
| 43 |
EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS="--quiet-build=n" |
Archives