Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Mark Knecht <markknecht@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Internet radio?
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 01:52:31
Message-Id: 5bdc1c8b0901271752y38d33d7va78c428a5e8f6861@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Internet radio? by Nick Cunningham
1 On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 5:17 PM, Nick Cunningham <nick@××××××××××.net> wrote:
2 >
3 >
4 > 2009/1/27 Mark Knecht <markknecht@×××××.com>
5 >>
6 >> On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 3:11 PM, Paul Hartman
7 >> <paul.hartman+gentoo@×××××.com> wrote:
8 >> > On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 5:03 PM, Mark Knecht <markknecht@×××××.com>
9 >> > wrote:
10 >> >> My dad is interested in some sort of an Internet Radio app for his
11 >> >> Gnome desktop. He was thinking of buying a Slingbox but has backed off
12 >> >> the idea. For a while we played with iTunes under Wine but that's sort
13 >> >> of a mess so I'm looking for something native to Linux.
14 >> >
15 >> > I don't understand what Slingbox has to do with internet radio. Amarok
16 >> > 2 (not gnome) has hundreds of internet radio stations in it...
17 >> >
18 >> > I think most of them are just mp3 streams, so if you get the URL from
19 >> > anywhere out there on the web you should be able to play it with any
20 >> > media player I would think. Check out shoutcast.com.
21 >>
22 >> Am I wrong about the product name? It was specifically a stand alone
23 >> Internet radio player. It looks like a clock radio almost that sits by
24 >> the bed. I'm not finding it on their site now. Wonder if they
25 >> discontinued it? Maybe I'm thinking of the wrong company. It used to
26 >> show up on the Pandora site but I don't see it there either.
27 >>
28 >> Anyway, I should have stated that he has almost no interest in
29 >> listening to music. He wants to listen to news form around the world.
30 >> BBC, NPR and whatever he can find.
31 >>
32 >> I was looking at Amarok 2 based on your other thread and that reminded
33 >> me about this topic. I didn't want to hijack that thread though.
34 >>
35 >> What keywords are required to get Amarok 2 to build? I'm not clear
36 >> what ~*2.0.1.1 means.
37 >>
38 >> Thanks,
39 >> Mark
40 >>
41 >
42 > Be aware that amarok2 is currently broken on amd64 (hence the mask) due to
43 > problems with mysql (which it now requires by default). If you look back in
44 > the archives there have been threads explaining how to work around it and
45 > get mysql working so amarok2 builds ok.
46 >
47 > - Nick
48 >
49
50 Thanks. I'm going to build it on ~x86 instead.
51
52 cheers,
53 Mark