| 1 |
Am 16.08.2011 02:18, schrieb Dale: |
| 2 |
> Sebastian Beßler wrote: |
| 3 |
>> |
| 4 |
>> But why was autounmask=y complaining but not autounmask=n? |
| 5 |
>> The dependency of the virtual was missing both times so shouldn't emerge |
| 6 |
>> spit some error out both times? |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
>> Greetings |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
>> Sebastian |
| 11 |
>> |
| 12 |
>> |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Because autounmask=n assumes you don't want to upgrade anything that is |
| 15 |
> masked so it didn't suggest it. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
But there was a broken dependency, not just something that could be |
| 18 |
upgraded. autounmask=y now, after setting the virtual to -~amd64 too, is |
| 19 |
quiet and doesn't tells me to unmask anything. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Still think that emerge should have thrown an error both times, but if |
| 22 |
it is ok for anyone here that it doesn't then it is ok for me too ;-) |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
> Ain't life confusing? |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Yes, yes it is! |
Archives