Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Bill Longman <bill.longman@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] ACPI conflict while loading it87 module
Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2010 22:00:38
Message-Id: 4C589179.60008@gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] ACPI conflict while loading it87 module by pk
1 On 08/02/2010 01:02 PM, pk wrote:
2 > On 2010-08-02 17:49, Bill Longman wrote:
3 >
4 >> I just saw, this weekend in fact, that the newer Phenoms, in fact most
5 >> of the recent K10 CPUs, do not work accurately with the atk0110 so when
6 >> the driver starts to load, it flatly refuses. I have a 9750 Phenom and
7 >> that one works great. Works fine in my X2 4000+. These are all assus
8 >> [sic] mobos. But my 940 Phenom II won't work, thusly:
9 >>
10 >> k10temp 0000:00:18.3: unreliable CPU thermal sensor; monitoring disabled
11 >
12 > Isn't k10temp a different/separate module? If I go to lm-sensors site
13 > (http://www.lm-sensors.org/wiki/Devices) I see this:
14 >
15 > "k10temp PCI 2.6.33 or standalone driver (2009-12-06) Embedded
16 > sensors are known to be unreliable on the DR-BA, DR-B2, DR-B3, RB-C2 and
17 > HY-D0 revisions of the family 10h CPU, which will never be supported.
18 > Driver contributed by Clemens Ladisch, reviewed by Jean Delvare."
19 >
20 > So if you have one of those CPU revisions I guess you're out of luck?
21 > The chipset on my main "rig" (Asus m/b) is running a Intel chipset... I
22 > have only older AMD CPUs (Athlon X2 BE2400) with Gigabyte motherboards
23 > which doesn't have the atk0110 so I'm unfortunately not much of help...
24
25 Well, I added CONFIG_SENSORS_ATK0110=y to my 940/M4A79DX setup and
26 gkrellm doesn't show anything. That was one test only, so take it with a
27 grain of salt.