Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Richard Fish <bigfish@××××××××××.org>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] getting somewhere -- was about a bug
Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 20:47:17
Message-Id: 7573e9640605181334j5a9339f3t473b5c3df7940f24@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] getting somewhere -- was about a bug by Neil Bothwick
1 On 5/18/06, Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> wrote:
2 > It is supposed to have noauto, because /boot does not need to be mounted
3 > in the normal course of events. GRUB doesn't use /etc/fstab, it uses
4 > grub.conf to find the kernel. The only time you need to mount /boot is
5 > when installing a new kernel.
6
7 I disagree that it is 'supposed' to have noauto. This could make the
8 system more secure, but so could mounting it read-only. Users do
9 forget to mount it before updating the kernel, and they get confused
10 about why the system isn't booting from their freshly compiled kernel.
11 I am sure Maxim is not the only one to do this...
12
13 In fact, the current handbook says:
14
15 -------
16 Code Listing 2: An example /boot line for /etc/fstab
17 /dev/hda1 /boot ext2 defaults 1 2
18
19 Some users don't want their /boot partition to be mounted
20 automatically to improve their system's security. Those people should
21 substitute defaults with noauto. This does mean that you need to
22 manually mount this partition every time you want to use it.
23 -------
24
25 So it seems that 'noauto' is an option for specific users. Not for
26 general use...
27
28 -Richard
29
30 --
31 gentoo-user@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] getting somewhere -- was about a bug Mike Williams <mike@××××××××.uk>
Re: [gentoo-user] getting somewhere -- was about a bug Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk>