1 |
Dale wrote: |
2 |
> Michael wrote: |
3 |
>> On Saturday, 6 August 2022 07:07:26 BST Dale wrote: |
4 |
>> |
5 |
>>> Well, that settles that then. I guess it will be Surfshark. Pretty |
6 |
>>> sure it is in the Netherlands but may be wrong on country. I just |
7 |
>>> recall it being outside US jurisdiction. I also read they have been |
8 |
>>> audited by independent people to ensure they have no logs even if asked. |
9 |
>> Surfshark gets good reviews and it offers the wireguard protocol with the |
10 |
>> ChaCha20 cipher for better encryption and performance. However, the |
11 |
>> Netherlands is part of the EU and 14 eyes, so I would think similar state |
12 |
>> powers exist to access your private communications and the ISPs would have no |
13 |
>> way of refusing and staying in business. Surfshark offers a warrant canary, |
14 |
>> but it looks more like a marketing statement to me when you compare it to |
15 |
>> something like the Qubes digitally signed canaries. |
16 |
> |
17 |
> I forgot about the 14 eyes thing. Do you know of one outside that that |
18 |
> is good? The bad thing about most, they are pricey if done by the month |
19 |
> for testing. You only get a good deal if you subscribe for a year or |
20 |
> even two years. I don't want to subscribe and then find out it is a bad |
21 |
> one. |
22 |
> |
23 |
> Dale |
24 |
> |
25 |
> :-) :-) |
26 |
> |
27 |
|
28 |
|
29 |
I did a quick google search and Surfshark is based in British Virgin |
30 |
Islands and is outside the eyes countries. I was thinking it was |
31 |
Netherlands but wasn't sure. When I searched for VPN outside 14 eyes |
32 |
country, Surfshark is highly rated. Depending on the site, it's in the |
33 |
top few each time. |
34 |
|
35 |
https://earthweb.com/vpn-outside-14-eyes/ |
36 |
|
37 |
https://www.privateproxyguide.com/best-vpn-outside-14-eyes/ |
38 |
|
39 |
Unless there is some good reason to avoid, still thinking of using it. |
40 |
|
41 |
Dale |
42 |
|
43 |
:-) :-) |