| 1 |
felix@×××××××.com wrote: |
| 2 |
> This has been going on now for months. Is there some reason these two |
| 3 |
> can't co-exist? Or is there some better fix than just ignoring it or |
| 4 |
> adding an entry to package.mask? |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> !!! Multiple package instances within a single package slot have been pulled |
| 7 |
> !!! into the dependency graph, resulting in a slot conflict: |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> sys-libs/readline:0 |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> ('ebuild', '/', 'sys-libs/readline-5.2_p13', 'merge') pulled in by |
| 12 |
> =sys-libs/readline-5* required by ('installed', '/', 'dev-lang/ghc-6.8.2', 'nomerge') |
| 13 |
> (and 54 more) |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> ('installed', '/', 'sys-libs/readline-6.0_p3', 'nomerge') pulled in by |
| 16 |
> >=sys-libs/readline-4.1 required by ('installed', '/', 'dev-db/unixODBC-2.2.12', 'nomerge') |
| 17 |
> >=sys-libs/readline-4.1 required by ('installed', '/', 'net-misc/socat-1.7.1.1', 'nomerge') |
| 18 |
> sys-libs/readline required by world |
| 19 |
> (and 51 more) |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
I don't use haskell, but ghc's v6.8.2 ebuild seems to have been silently |
| 23 |
bumped [1], which changed among other things the dependency on readline |
| 24 |
to be more lenient upwards. You probably have the old one installed and |
| 25 |
as the bump is silent, portage doesn't re-emerge ghc automatically. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
My suggested fix (hopefully fixes this, but I'm not 100% certain): |
| 28 |
emerge -1 ghc, so that portage will realize the changes from the silent |
| 29 |
bump. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
[1] |
| 32 |
http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/dev-lang/ghc/ghc-6.8.2.ebuild?rev=1.11&view=log |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
HTH |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
-- |
| 37 |
Arttu V. |
Archives