Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Dirk Heinrichs <dirk.heinrichs@××××××.de>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Abut smb:// aware tools
Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2009 18:37:50
Message-Id: 200910032036.48308.dirk.heinrichs@online.de
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] Re: Abut smb:// aware tools by Harry Putnam
1 Am Samstag 03 Oktober 2009 20:10:30 schrieb Harry Putnam:
2 > Dirk Heinrichs <dirk.heinrichs@××××××.de> writes:
3 > > Hmm, "Not commonly used", don't know. First versions of autofs date back
4 > > to April 97, amd is much older, I think. So no, automounting is NOT new
5 > > in Linux, it's there for over a decade now.
6 >
7 > At nearly 70, I can call a decade `fairly recent'.
8 >
9 > I have to beg to differ here... I don't mean your statements about when
10 > it appeared...
11 >
12 > Linux is much older than 1997... and as I said I started a little
13 > before that... At that time there were not many users at all not to
14 > mention users using automounting. I'd hazard a guess that total users
15 > was not much over 150,000 or so... just an idle guess though.
16
17 I wouldn't even dare to guess :)
18
19 > The newbies like me were definitely not using it.... linux then took much
20 > more config than it does today... even on gentoo today. You could easily
21 > spend 2 or more wks getting X up... or even getting it to boot.
22
23 Yeah, I know. I started with Linux roughly one or two years before you did.
24
25 > Building your own kernel was well out of the grasp of newbies at that
26 > time.
27
28 Then there must have been two types of newbies ;)
29
30 > So in that atmosphere... its not true that automount was in common use.
31
32 As I wrote I don't know. I used it, but again I wouldn't dare to guess how
33 many others did.
34
35 Bye...
36
37 Dirk