Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From:	Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk>
To:	gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject:	Re: [gentoo-user] Understanding why portage wants to downgrade nvidia-cuda-sdk
Date:	Tue, 02 Jul 2013 08:04:46
Message-Id:	`20130702090424.17eebb11@digimed.co.uk`
In Reply to:	Re: [gentoo-user] Understanding why portage wants to downgrade nvidia-cuda-sdk by Chris Stankevitz

1	On Mon, 1 Jul 2013 18:06:36 -0700, Chris Stankevitz wrote:
2	dev-util/nvidia-cuda-sdk-4.2
3	> Why does the atom "~dev-util/nvidia-cuda-sdk-4.2" NOT apply to
4	> "dev-util/nvidia-cuda-sdk-4.2.9-r2"?
5
6	It applies to version 4.2 and all revisions. 4.2.9 is a different version
7
8	You need one of
9
10	=dev-util/nvidia-cuda-sdk-4.2*
11	>dev-util/nvidia-cuda-sdk-4.2
12
13
14	--
15	Neil Bothwick
16
17	If Wile E. Coyote had enough money to buy all that ACME crap, why didn't
18	he just buy dinner?

File name	MIME type
signature.asc	application/pgp-signature

Subject	Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Understanding why portage wants to downgrade nvidia-cuda-sdk	Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com>