Archives
Archives
| From: | App Deb <appdebgr@×××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Best way to improve interactivity with heavy disk activity? | ||
| Date: | Sun, 28 Nov 2010 07:21:22 | ||
| Message-Id: | AANLkTikg8bFDu9KPN7xBoYXU9-MT0MP+C1+w5DwFfHPP@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-user] Re: Best way to improve interactivity with heavy disk activity? by Nikos Chantziaras |
||
| 1 | On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 2:13 AM, Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@×××××.de> wrote: |
| 2 | > On 11/28/2010 01:03 AM, Stroller wrote: |
| 3 | >> |
| 4 | >> On 27/11/2010, at 10:22pm, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: |
| 5 | >>> |
| 6 | >>> The ck patch set does not support group scheduling anyway; |
| 7 | >> |
| 8 | >> Now I'm a little more confused. Does `ionice` need the CFQ scheduler? |
| 9 | > |
| 10 | > Nope. I/O scheduling priorities are part of the I/O scheduler, not the CPU |
| 11 | > scheduler. |
| 12 | |
| 13 | CFQ is the official I/O scheduler. |
| 14 | |
| 15 | ionice only works with CFQ. |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| [gentoo-user] Re: Best way to improve interactivity with heavy disk activity? | walt <w41ter@×××××.com> |