1 |
Am 14.11.2013 21:23, schrieb James: |
2 |
|
3 |
>>> timeout=5 |
4 |
>>> menuentry 'Pentoo' { |
5 |
>>> insmod efi_gop |
6 |
>>> insmod efi_uga |
7 |
>>> insmod part_msdos |
8 |
>>> insmod part_gpt |
9 |
>>> root=(hd0,2) |
10 |
>>> linux /boot/kernel-genkernel-x86_64-3.9.9-pentoo root=/dev/ram0 |
11 |
>>> real_root= video= console=tty1 ro |
12 |
>>> initrd /boot/initramfs-genkernel-x86_64-3.9.9-pentoo |
13 |
>>> } |
14 |
>>> |
15 |
>> |
16 |
>> Do you have the boot symlink on your boot partition? |
17 |
>> $ ls -al /boot/boot |
18 |
>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 1 Sep 23 2011 /boot/boot -> . |
19 |
|
20 |
|
21 |
I want to take another effort and retry to get my box booted via UEFI |
22 |
again. I had that working back then, Gentoo and Win7 ... since it failed |
23 |
due to some SSD-swapping and stuff I have never seen Win7 again ;-) |
24 |
|
25 |
Aside from the "I want it because it sounds more modern and is |
26 |
complicated": do we get any benefit from booting via UEFI? |
27 |
|
28 |
AFAI understand (haven't googled it today but read about it back then) |
29 |
one of the major issues is hdd- and partition-size, right? So if I only |
30 |
have disks/partitions smaller than 2 TB ... no real difference, right? |
31 |
|
32 |
I also play around with the booting of EFI-Stub-Kernels ... (getting rid |
33 |
of GRUB2) |
34 |
|
35 |
I got it started but it somehow stopped booting and just sat there. With |
36 |
and without EFI_FB set. |
37 |
|
38 |
Maybe I should use part-uuids instead of device-names next time |
39 |
especially as I have / on sdc1 and the UEFI-ESP on sda1 (just a thought). |
40 |
|
41 |
just asking for discussion and experience ... |
42 |
|
43 |
Stefan |