Archives
Archives
| From: | Anthony Metcalf <nevyn@××××××××××.uk> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] [Even More OT] Fragmentation of my drives. Curious mostly | ||
| Date: | Mon, 01 Dec 2008 22:08:05 | ||
| Message-Id: | 4934602B.4000404@anferny.me.uk | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] Fragmentation of my drives. Curious mostly by Daniel Iliev |
||
| 1 | Ignoring the MS/*nix argument for a moment..... |
| 2 | |
| 3 | How does fragmentation work on hardware RAID? |
| 4 | |
| 5 | The normal argument of more fragmentation = more seeks = worse |
| 6 | performance would seem to be eliminated by a controller with a large |
| 7 | cache and lots of drives (say a Dell/Equallogic PS5000E in RAID 10.....). |
| 8 | |
| 9 | A |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] [Even More OT] Fragmentation of my drives. Curious mostly | Joshua Murphy <poisonbl@×××××.com> |