1 |
* Michael Mol <mikemol@×××××.com> [120304 15:12]: |
2 |
> So I take a lot of pictures. A *lot* of pictures. Sometimes around |
3 |
> 500/month, sometimes twice that if I manage to get out more. I've got |
4 |
> a large number of 'DCIM' directories from different cameras, different |
5 |
> camera models, etc, going back ten years. Sometimes in JPG, sometimes |
6 |
> RAW, sometimes both. |
7 |
> |
8 |
> And I've never really managed them well. |
9 |
> |
10 |
> Does anyone have any photo management tool they like? I've got bits of |
11 |
> Qt and Gtk installed already, and while I'd prefer to avoid pulling in |
12 |
> a full desktop environment, I might--if the tool is good enough. It |
13 |
> would have to: |
14 |
> |
15 |
> * Handle RAW (via libraw or dcraw is fine), JPEG, PNG[1] and TIFF[1] |
16 |
> content and metadata |
17 |
> * Index by metadata, including things like the recording camera's |
18 |
> serial number[2] |
19 |
> * Not be destructive, or ambiguous about being destructive, on image |
20 |
> import. I tried using Amarok to organize my music, which is in similar |
21 |
> disarray, and I was never sure if it was being destructive about the |
22 |
> source files/folders. So I made copies. Which ultimately added to the |
23 |
> disarray. |
24 |
> |
25 |
> |
26 |
> [1] My postprocessing occasionally winds up in lossless formats like these. |
27 |
> [2] My fiancee and I have the same model camera, and occasionally need |
28 |
> to share memory cards, so I'd like to be able to use serial number to |
29 |
> distinguish whose is whose. |
30 |
> |
31 |
> -- |
32 |
> :wq |
33 |
|
34 |
I like Digikam a lot. |
35 |
|
36 |
There's some rough edges, but part of that is because a lot of |
37 |
development is being done all the time on it with lots of new features |
38 |
added. Obviously sticking to a non-bleeding edge build would reduce |
39 |
that a lot. |
40 |
|
41 |
The developers are all quite responsive and the Gentoo packager |
42 |
(Andreas) is very active too. |
43 |
|
44 |
I run it from the command line without KDE running though it's a KDE app |
45 |
(so you'll have to pull in bits of KDE.) |
46 |
|
47 |
Try it though. It may not be the kind of managing you're looking for |
48 |
(though I think it can do everything you've mentioned above with a |
49 |
recent enough version.) |
50 |
|
51 |
Todd |