Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Pandu Poluan <pandu@××××××.info>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Progress on s/udev/mdev/
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2011 01:42:53
Message-Id: CAA2qdGV9xnSpr9gyhWaL1_ktpLxLwjsT0ZwyUob5zsob1LdQmA@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Progress on s/udev/mdev/ by Neil Bothwick
1 On Nov 19, 2011 6:56 AM, "Neil Bothwick" <neil@××××××××××.uk> wrote:
2 >
3 > On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 09:38:42 +1100, Paul Colquhoun wrote:
4 >
5 > > > ... but every "eix-sync && emerge -avuD @world" finds me having to
6 > > > re-edit /usr/portage/virtual/dev-manager/dev-manager-0.ebuild, or else
7 > > > portage wants to emerge sys-apps/makedev and sys-fs/static-dev
8 > > >
9 > > > Is there a way to 'force' portage to use the edited
10 > > > dev-manager-0.ebuild and not the original version pulled in by
11 > > > eix-sync?
12 >
13 > > You can copy the ebuild to your own private overlay
14 > > ( /usr/local/portage ) make your changes there, and bump the version
15 > > number slightly.
16 >
17 > No need to bump the version number, overlays take priority over the
18 > standard tree when there are equal version numbers.
19 >
20
21 I knew I forgot something so simple >.<
22
23 Thanks!
24
25 Hmmm... so, @waltdnes, you should modify the procedure a bit, there...
26
27 Rgds,

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Progress on s/udev/mdev/ waltdnes@××××××××.org