| 1 |
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 8:36 AM, Kevin O'Gorman <kogorman@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
> I just ran "emerge -p --depclean" and the only thing it wants to remove is |
| 3 |
> gentoo-sources-2.6.35-r12. So my system's pretty clean, but I'm quite |
| 4 |
> puzzled with this result. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> I have 5 versions of gentoo-sources installed, and the one it wants to ditch |
| 7 |
> is the one I'm actually using. I can understand why it wouldn't care about |
| 8 |
> that, but why not: |
| 9 |
> 2.6.31-r10 which is no longer in the tree |
| 10 |
> any of the others, which are marked in exactly the same way as the |
| 11 |
> victim it picked? Some are older, and some are newer than this |
| 12 |
> victim. What gives? |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> I'm just wondering about how --depclean picked on this one of the five? |
| 15 |
> -- |
| 16 |
> Kevin O'Gorman, PhD |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Look in /var/lib/portage/world and see if you are protecting the |
| 20 |
versions you think it should be cleaning but it isn't. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Hope this helps, |
| 23 |
Mark |
Archives