1 |
On 2010-04-19, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
> On Monday 19 April 2010 16:49:34 Grant Edwards wrote: |
3 |
>> On 2010-04-19, Tanstaafl <tanstaafl@×××××××××××.org> wrote: |
4 |
>> > On 2010-04-18 6:27 PM, Peter Humphrey wrote: |
5 |
>> >> On Sunday 18 April 2010 22:06:44 Mick wrote: |
6 |
>> >>> I was reminded that I do not understand sendmail enough for my liking. |
7 |
>> >> |
8 |
>> >> Does anybody? |
9 |
>> > |
10 |
>> ><flame-protect> |
11 |
>> > |
12 |
>> > That's why Wietse invented postfix. |
13 |
>> > |
14 |
>> ></flame-protect> |
15 |
>> |
16 |
>> I gave up on sendmail about 12 years ago and switched to qmail and/or |
17 |
>> postfix. I didn't know anybody was still using sendmail. Is it the |
18 |
>> default MTA for any of the popular Linux distros? |
19 |
> |
20 |
> Yes. Centos/RedHat et al. The installer has a screen to let you |
21 |
> choose, but if you click-click-click-Yes through it like most |
22 |
> numbnuts will, sendmail is what you get. |
23 |
|
24 |
And yet the "geekier" distros like Debian and Gentoo gave up on |
25 |
sendmail years ago. You can install sendmail in either, but people |
26 |
don't seem to. |
27 |
|
28 |
> How do I know this? Because I fought valiantly with one of them |
29 |
> today. |
30 |
> |
31 |
> I took me 90 minutes to figure out how to add a SmartHost. Vogon |
32 |
> poetry is a delight compared to those damn .cf files. And the .mc's |
33 |
> aren't much better. |
34 |
|
35 |
There's a reason why the chapter on Mail in the Unix Hater's Handbook |
36 |
has the quote: |
37 |
|
38 |
Not having sendmail is like not having VD. |
39 |
Ron Heiby |
40 |
Former moderator, comp.newprod |
41 |
|
42 |
The UHH "Mail" chapter is mostly about sendmail: |
43 |
|
44 |
Sendmail was built while the Internet mail handling systems were in |
45 |
flux. As a result, it had to be programmable so that it could |
46 |
handle any possible changes in the standards. Delve into the |
47 |
mysteries of sendmail's unreadable sendmail.cf files and |
48 |
you'll discover ways of rewiring sendmail's insides so that |
49 |
@#$@$^%<<<@#) at @$%#^! is a valid e-mail address. That was great |
50 |
in 1985. In 1994, the Internet mail standards have been decided |
51 |
upon and such flexibility is no longer needed. Nevertheless, all of |
52 |
sendmail's rope is still there, ready to make a hangman's knot, |
53 |
should anyone have a sudden urge. |
54 |
|
55 |
I particularly like the list of reasons why the Sendmail book has a |
56 |
bat on the cover: |
57 |
|
58 |
* The common North American brown bat's diet is composed principally |
59 |
of bugs. Sendmail is a software package which is composed |
60 |
principally of bugs. |
61 |
|
62 |
* Sendmail and bats both suck. |
63 |
|
64 |
* Sendmail maintainers and bats both tend to be nocturnal creatures, |
65 |
making "eep eep" noises which are incomprehensible to the average |
66 |
person. |
67 |
|
68 |
* Have you ever watched a bat fly? Have you ever watched Sendmail |
69 |
process a queue full of undelivered mail? QED. |
70 |
|
71 |
* Sendmail and bats both die quickly when kept in captivity. |
72 |
|
73 |
* Bat guano is a good source of potassium nitrate, a principal |
74 |
ingredient in things that blow up in your face. Like Sendmail. |
75 |
|
76 |
* Both bats and sendmail are held in low esteem by the general |
77 |
public. |
78 |
|
79 |
* Bats require magical rituals involving crosses and garlic to get |
80 |
them to do what you want. Sendmail likewise requires mystical |
81 |
incantations such as: |
82 |
|
83 |
R<$+>$*$=Y$~A$* $:<$1>$2$3?$4$5 Mark user portion. |
84 |
R<$+>$*!$+,$*?$+ <$1>$2!$3!$4?$5 is inferior to @ |
85 |
R<$+>$+,$*?$+ <$1>$2:$3?$4 Change src rte to % path |
86 |
R<$+>:$+ <$1>,$2 Change % to @ for immed. domain |
87 |
R<$=X$-.UUCP>!?$+ $@<$1$2.UUCP>!$3 Return UUCP |
88 |
R<$=X$->!?$+ $@<$1$2>!$3 Return unqualified |
89 |
R<$+>$+?$+ <$1>$2$3 Remove '?' |
90 |
R<$+.$+>$=Y$+ $@<$1.$2>,$4 Change do user@domain |
91 |
|
92 |
* Farmers consider bats their friends because of the insects they |
93 |
eat. Farmers consider Sendmail their friend because it gets more |
94 |
collegeeducated people interested in subsistence farming as a |
95 |
career. |
96 |
|
97 |
Note that this was written in the early 1990s. Sendmail has been |
98 |
considered archaic and overly complex for almost 20 years. |
99 |
|
100 |
-- |
101 |
Grant Edwards grant.b.edwards Yow! My mind is making |
102 |
at ashtrays in Dayton ... |
103 |
gmail.com |