| 1 |
Nikos Chantziaras wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 06/22/2011 02:18 PM, Dale wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Nikos Chantziaras wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> On 06/22/2011 06:55 AM, Dale wrote: |
| 5 |
>>>> I just did my updates and ran into this: |
| 6 |
>>>> |
| 7 |
>>>> * Maintainer: sci@g.o |
| 8 |
>>>> * USE: amd64 consolekit elibc_glibc kernel_linux multilib policykit |
| 9 |
>>>> userland_GNU |
| 10 |
>>>> * FEATURES: preserve-libs sandbox |
| 11 |
>>>> |
| 12 |
>>>> * Please install currently selected gcc version with USE=fortran. |
| 13 |
>>>> * If you intend to use a different compiler then gfortran, please |
| 14 |
>>>> * set FC variable accordingly and take care that the neccessary |
| 15 |
>>>> * fortran dialects are support. |
| 16 |
>>>> [...] |
| 17 |
>>>> |
| 18 |
>>>> Heads up for folks about to do their updates, check into the USE flag |
| 19 |
>>>> fortran to see if you need to add it to yours before updating a |
| 20 |
>>>> bunch of |
| 21 |
>>>> stuff. |
| 22 |
>>> |
| 23 |
>>> Uninstall sci-libs/blas-reference I guess. And probably whatever |
| 24 |
>>> depends on it. Please do an "emerge -pv --depclean blas-reference" and |
| 25 |
>>> post the output so we can see what's pulling it as a dep on your |
| 26 |
>>> system. |
| 27 |
>>> |
| 28 |
>> |
| 29 |
>> Here is the output: |
| 30 |
>> |
| 31 |
>> root@fireball / # emerge -pv --depclean blas-reference |
| 32 |
>> |
| 33 |
>> Calculating dependencies... done! |
| 34 |
>> sci-libs/blas-reference-20070226 pulled in by: |
| 35 |
>> virtual/blas-1.0 |
| 36 |
> |
| 37 |
> OK, that didn't help. Try: emerge -pv --depclean virtual/blas |
| 38 |
> |
| 39 |
> |
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
Here you go: |
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
root@fireball / # emerge -pv --depclean virtual/blas |
| 44 |
|
| 45 |
Calculating dependencies... done! |
| 46 |
virtual/blas-1.0 pulled in by: |
| 47 |
dev-lang/R-2.10.1 |
| 48 |
|
| 49 |
>>> No packages selected for removal by depclean |
| 50 |
Packages installed: 989 |
| 51 |
Packages in world: 119 |
| 52 |
Packages in system: 51 |
| 53 |
Required packages: 989 |
| 54 |
Number to remove: 0 |
| 55 |
root@fireball / # |
| 56 |
|
| 57 |
|
| 58 |
>> Two things. I read about this on -dev but didn't realize it was going to |
| 59 |
>> affect me until I saw the message. After I added fortran to my USE line |
| 60 |
>> in make.conf, it only rebuilt gcc then revdep-rebuild rebuilt |
| 61 |
>> dev-lang/ifc-10.0.026-r1. Everything appears to be clean now. |
| 62 |
>> |
| 63 |
>> To think people wonder why my USE line is so big. I keep having to add |
| 64 |
>> stuff when portage pukes but portage never tells me when one has fell |
| 65 |
>> off the reservation and needs to be removed. < sighs > Over the years, |
| 66 |
>> it adds up. |
| 67 |
> |
| 68 |
> That is no solution. I highly doubt you need a Fortran compiler :-/ |
| 69 |
> By adding more stuff to your make.conf as a work-around for problems |
| 70 |
> like this, you add more and more stuff to your Gentoo install; stuff |
| 71 |
> you actually have zero use for. By that logic, you could enable every |
| 72 |
> possible USE flag that exists so that you always have everything, just |
| 73 |
> in case. But then you should probably be using openSUSE or something :-P |
| 74 |
> |
| 75 |
> |
| 76 |
> |
| 77 |
Well, it appeared to only affect gcc here. We all know I have to have |
| 78 |
that. lol Do you really want me to send you my USE line in make.conf? |
| 79 |
I copied it from my old install on another rig and it has been added to |
| 80 |
ever since oh about 2003. It has some size to it. Keep in mind, they |
| 81 |
didn't have package.use for a long time too. |
| 82 |
|
| 83 |
I really need to clean out some stuff but want to have time to finish it |
| 84 |
when I start. I don't have that sort of time during garden season. I |
| 85 |
need food more than I need a puter. ;-) |
| 86 |
|
| 87 |
Dale |
| 88 |
|
| 89 |
:-) :-) |
Archives