Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Matan Peled <chaosite@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Unmask Java 1.5.0
Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2004 15:32:46
Message-Id: 41B5CD06.7030204@gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Unmask Java 1.5.0 by Felix Tiede
1 Felix Tiede wrote:
2
3 > Kristian Bisgaard Lassen wrote:
4 >
5 >> Hi,
6 >>
7 >> How do I emerge Java 1.5.0 without emerging it from /usr/portage. I
8 >> have tried to put an entry like this
9 >>
10 >> >=dev-java/sun-sdk-1.5.0 ~x86 (maybe the actual ebuild name is not
11 >> correct)
12 >>
13 >> in my /etc/portage/package.unmask. I also tried to put in my
14 >> /etc/portage/package.keywords.
15 >>
16 >> Any suggestions?
17 >>
18 >
19 > First of all: There's no such ebuild "sun-sdk". It's called "sun-jdk".
20 >
21 > For 1.5.0 you need to have it in both package.keywords _and_
22 > package.unmask:
23 > # echo "=dev-java/sun-jdk-1.5.0 ~x86" >> /etc/portage/package.keywords
24 > # echo "=dev-java/sun-jdk-1.5.0" >> /etc/portage/package.unmask
25 > # echo "=dev-java/java-sdk-docs-1.5.0 ~x86" >>
26 > /etc/portage/package.keywords
27 > # echo "=dev-java/java-sdk-docs-1.5.0" >> /etc/portage/package.unmask
28 >
29 > That did the trick on my boxed, synced this morning.
30 >
31 > It applies only to java-sdk-docs, if you have doc in your USE-flags.
32 >
33 > HTH, regards
34 > Felix
35 >
36 Right.
37
38
39 Note that one of the problems was that the "~x86" part is unneccesary in
40 package.unmask - so make sure you do not have any faulty entries there.

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature