1 |
On Wednesday 03 June 2009 17:43:56 James Homuth wrote: |
2 |
> I noticed yesterday gentoo-sources-2.6.29 was released, and was wondering |
3 |
> if it's required that the kernel be upgraded |
4 |
|
5 |
no |
6 |
|
7 |
> (I'm currently running 2.6.28. |
8 |
|
9 |
nothing wrong with that |
10 |
|
11 |
> I did download the sources (Should I have done that?), |
12 |
|
13 |
yes, it doesn't hurt. Not required, but good to have |
14 |
|
15 |
> but in the event |
16 |
> it's not mandatory or anything to upgrade the kernel I'd really like to not |
17 |
> have to recompile the thing. |
18 |
|
19 |
so don't. |
20 |
|
21 |
You only *have* to upgrade the kernel if you want some feature the current one |
22 |
in use does not support |
23 |
|
24 |
> Related, however, if I do recompile it and |
25 |
> decide to do so with genkernel, |
26 |
|
27 |
Yuck. I tell people to stay away from that thing. |
28 |
|
29 |
Just learn how to do it yourself. It's not hard, you get only what you want, |
30 |
and there are thousands of howtos all over the net |
31 |
|
32 |
> will it respect the settings I've compiled |
33 |
> into 2.6.28 or will they need to be reset again before 2.6.29 is compiled? |
34 |
|
35 |
No. Not unless you give it the old config to use. IIRC it has some feature to |
36 |
use the config for the currently running kernel (/proc/config.gz) if the |
37 |
running kernel supports it. But I could be may off course here too. |
38 |
|
39 |
> thanks for any information on the subject. |
40 |
|
41 |
You'll get MUCH better answers by reading the kernel compile guide in the docs |
42 |
section of gentoo.org. Your post implies that you have not read it, as all |
43 |
your questions are answered in it. Knowledgeable folks here will give you the |
44 |
same answers, so just read the doc instead... |
45 |
|
46 |
-- |
47 |
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com |