| 1 |
On Fri, 2010-07-02 at 04:39 +0200, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 09:34:25PM -0400, Albert Hopkins wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> > The OP was over 3 months ago. I think a lack of response speaks volumes |
| 5 |
> > compared to responding so late. It was a thread that was DOA. Why did |
| 6 |
> > you decide to dig it up? |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> The real reason is that I don't have time to track this list in a per |
| 9 |
> day, week or even in a per month basis. I don't think it's a problem |
| 10 |
> that much. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Is there any reason to not answer, even late? Some problem are |
| 13 |
> blocking, some aren't and can be delayed a long time. Who knows? |
| 14 |
> Even if everything seems to show the problem is solved or turned around, |
| 15 |
> people usually like to understand what could have happen or have more |
| 16 |
> clues. I already had such feedback for problems older than one year. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> Now, what I was saying is more about "how to make my chances bigger to |
| 19 |
> have answers in general" than trying to explain "why a lack of |
| 20 |
> response". |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
You are absolutely correct. Please continue with this thread. We look |
| 24 |
forward to your response in a month or so. |
Archives