1 |
Neil Bothwick <neil <at> digimed.co.uk> writes: |
2 |
|
3 |
|
4 |
> > Today, I have many many ugly and hacked java projects |
5 |
> > on my "munge" system. I have spend countless hours hacking |
6 |
> > at java; so I do not wish for any dev-java codes to be removed |
7 |
> > by --depclean, but the others can be cleaned up. |
8 |
|
9 |
> Why not simply create a set containing all the ebuilds you are |
10 |
> experimenting with? |
11 |
|
12 |
|
13 |
I'm not sure how to put everything dev-java into a set; so that |
14 |
it will updated but not depclean out those packages. |
15 |
|
16 |
Gotta quick example? It's been a while since I used sets in portage.... |
17 |
|
18 |
|
19 |
James |