Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: James <wireless@×××××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: depclean portect a class of ebuilds ?
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2015 23:03:50
Message-Id: loom.20150315T000134-85@post.gmane.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] depclean portect a class of ebuilds ? by Neil Bothwick
1 Neil Bothwick <neil <at> digimed.co.uk> writes:
2
3
4 > > Today, I have many many ugly and hacked java projects
5 > > on my "munge" system. I have spend countless hours hacking
6 > > at java; so I do not wish for any dev-java codes to be removed
7 > > by --depclean, but the others can be cleaned up.
8
9 > Why not simply create a set containing all the ebuilds you are
10 > experimenting with?
11
12
13 I'm not sure how to put everything dev-java into a set; so that
14 it will updated but not depclean out those packages.
15
16 Gotta quick example? It's been a while since I used sets in portage....
17
18
19 James

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: depclean portect a class of ebuilds ? Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com>
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: depclean portect a class of ebuilds ? Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk>