1 |
walt wrote: |
2 |
> Something in today's update for ~amd64 changed the bootup behavior |
3 |
> of lvm (again). Now I get an error message that none of the labels |
4 |
> on my lvm disks can be found (I mount by disk label in fstab). |
5 |
> |
6 |
> So now lvm is starting even later than before. I still get the |
7 |
> (now familiar) error from lvm that file locking failed, but I've |
8 |
> been seeing that since the last thread on the subject and this |
9 |
> problem just started today. (lvm does start eventually, but only |
10 |
> after fstab fails to find the lvm disks). |
11 |
> |
12 |
> While poking around in the rc scripts I realized that device-mapper |
13 |
> daemon is no longer running -- I think it was running a few months |
14 |
> ago but I can't be certain now. Should it be running? |
15 |
> |
16 |
> I added device-mapper to the boot runlevel but it changed nothing |
17 |
> AFAICT. |
18 |
> |
19 |
> Also, I notice that a /run directory on tmpfs appeared a while ago |
20 |
> (can't remember when) and I think that should have fixed the file |
21 |
> locking error from lvm, no? But it's not fixed for me. |
22 |
> |
23 |
> What are you guys seeing? |
24 |
> |
25 |
> |
26 |
> |
27 |
|
28 |
|
29 |
Have you searched the forums? I'm not sure but I think I ran across |
30 |
that issue while searching for the other issues you described, missing |
31 |
lock file. There was a fix for what you are having but I can't recall |
32 |
what it was off the top of my head. I think it was putting |
33 |
device-mapper in the boot runlevel but don't break things on my bad |
34 |
memory. :/ |
35 |
|
36 |
I'm also pretty sure I was using google to search the forums too. I |
37 |
have found that google does a MUCH better job with searches than the |
38 |
forums search tool. |
39 |
|
40 |
Dale |
41 |
|
42 |
:-) :-) |
43 |
|
44 |
-- |
45 |
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or |
46 |
how you interpreted my words! |
47 |
|
48 |
Miss the compile output? Hint: |
49 |
EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS="--quiet-build=n" |