Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Matthias Bethke <matthias@×××××××.de>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Is there a way to automate rsync of updated portage tree across multiple boxes without each having to pull it down from a gentoo mirror
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2008 17:29:25
Message-Id: 20080916172921.GI26609@aldous
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Is there a way to automate rsync of updated portage tree across multiple boxes without each having to pull it down from a gentoo mirror by Vaeth
1 Hi Vaeth,
2 on Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 07:14:48PM +0200, you wrote:
3 > > In addition, the default rsyncd configuration with Gentoo uses a chroot
4 > > jail.
5 >
6 > Also a chroot jail is not a security feature: There are several ways known
7 > how to break out.
8
9 Huh? In the case of NAT it's reasonable to say it's not a security
10 feature---it's a kludge that happens to increase security somewhat in
11 the standard case. But there's only one reason I can see why you'd use a
12 chroot environment *except* for security and that's to have more than
13 one set of system binaries active at the same time for different
14 applications. Which is normally a pretty bad kludge in itself (not that
15 I hadn't done it, to avoid endless library woes on a Debian system that
16 absolutely must be kept on Woody... :-S), I'd say the vast majority of
17 chroot jails are there for nothing else but security.
18
19 cheers,
20 Matthias
21 --
22 I prefer encrypted and signed messages. KeyID: FAC37665
23 Fingerprint: 8C16 3F0A A6FC DF0D 19B0 8DEF 48D9 1700 FAC3 7665

Replies