| 1 |
On 09/10/2013 10:13, Raffaele BELARDI wrote: |
| 2 |
> * Error: The above package list contains packages which cannot be |
| 3 |
> * installed at the same time on the same system. |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> (lxde-base/lxsession-0.4.9.2::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) |
| 6 |
> pulled in by |
| 7 |
> >=lxde-base/lxsession-0.4.6.1 required by |
| 8 |
> (lxde-base/lxde-meta-0.5.5-r3::gentoo, installed) |
| 9 |
> lxde-base/lxsession required by |
| 10 |
> (lxde-base/lxsession-edit-0.2.0::gentoo, installed) |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> (lxde-base/lxsession-edit-0.2.0::gentoo, installed) pulled in by |
| 13 |
> =lxde-base/lxsession-edit-0.2* required by |
| 14 |
> (lxde-base/lxde-meta-0.5.5-r3::gentoo, installed) |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> lxde-meta lists: |
| 17 |
> RDEPEND="... |
| 18 |
> =lxde-base/lxsession-0.4.6.1 |
| 19 |
> =lxde-base/lxsession-edit-0.2* |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> lxsession lists: |
| 22 |
> RDEPEND="${COMMON_DEPEND} |
| 23 |
> !lxde-base/lxsession-edit |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> So lxde-meta requires lxsession-edit and lxsession, but lxsession lists |
| 26 |
> lxsession-edit as blocker. Is it a bug in the ebuild? |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Looks like the lxsession-0.4.9.2 ebuild was updated and not catered for |
| 30 |
in the -meta ebuild |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
I'm having a hard time figuring out how that change got committed as |
| 33 |
quite obviously it could not have been tested - all ~arch lxde users |
| 34 |
will get this blocker every time ... |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
-- |
| 39 |
Alan McKinnon |
| 40 |
alan.mckinnon@×××××.com |
Archives