1 |
On Friday 07 Aug 2015 04:27:15 Fernando Rodriguez wrote: |
2 |
> On Thursday, August 06, 2015 6:18:59 PM Meino.Cramer@×××.de wrote: |
3 |
> > Hi, |
4 |
> > |
5 |
> > for my tablet PC I used a used 32GB FAT32 formatted SDcard. The |
6 |
> > formatting was already done by the manufacturer. |
7 |
> > Then I screwed it up and had to do the partioning and formatting |
8 |
> > myself again. "No big deal", I thought -- and was wrong. |
9 |
> > Yes, the "thing" I got could be read and written. But it was |
10 |
> > DAMN slow in comparison to the original formatting. |
11 |
> > |
12 |
> > I googled and found a description, which described exactly, |
13 |
> > what I wanted: An optimal formatting for one big FAT32 partion. |
14 |
> > I did it again ;) and: TADA! The speed was back. |
15 |
> > LINK:http://zero1-st.blogspot.de/2012/05/formatting-fat32-volumes-larger-> > than.html |
16 |
> > |
17 |
> > Now I need the something identical but explained in a way |
18 |
> > that it can be successfully applied to any partion layout |
19 |
> > and any SDcard size. |
20 |
> > Currently the new SDcard has 64GB (yes, the tablet eats that size |
21 |
> > well :) and needs at least two partions: One FAT32 and one ext4. |
22 |
> > May be that I need a different layout later. |
23 |
> > |
24 |
> > To what aspect and "logic" do I have to keep my eyes on, when |
25 |
> > it comes partioning/formatting any SDcard size with any partion |
26 |
> > layout and any filesystem? |
27 |
> > |
28 |
> > Thank you very much in advance for any help! |
29 |
> > Best regards, |
30 |
> > Meino |
31 |
> |
32 |
> I wrote a long reply to this and it appears to have been swallowed by |
33 |
> /dev/null. |
34 |
> |
35 |
> SD cards don't have 128K blocks. Except for the very early ones (standard |
36 |
> capacity), they are divided in allocation units (AU) that are 1MB to 4MB |
37 |
> for SDHC and even larger for SDXC. The only way to get that value is by |
38 |
> reading a register in the card (so you can't do it in usermode on linux). |
39 |
> |
40 |
> The AUs are divided into Recording Units (RUs). The size of these can be |
41 |
> deduced from the card speed class (that's the number inside the C on the |
42 |
> label), and the card capacity. For class 2 and 4 if the card is less than |
43 |
> 1GB it's 16KB, otherwise it's 32KB. For class 6 it is 64KB, and for class |
44 |
> 10 it's 512KB. |
45 |
> |
46 |
> After an AU is erased you can write to any of the free RUs in any order in |
47 |
> blocks of 512 bytes sequentially (the block size is configurable by the |
48 |
> driver but 512 is the most common). But if you write to a nonfree RU then |
49 |
> all non- free RU get copied to a new AU. So the performance hit depends on |
50 |
> how many non-free RUs are in the AU when this happens. |
51 |
> |
52 |
> So to get the best performance you need to align the first FAT cluster on |
53 |
> an AU boundary and that the RUs used by the reserved sectors after the FAT |
54 |
> are free. This is not so easy from usermode because you can't get the AU |
55 |
> size and you can't erase the AU to make sure reserved sectors are free. |
56 |
> The Windows 7 and later format utility will do it if you don't partition |
57 |
> the card. The next best thing is to align it to an RU which should be |
58 |
> pretty easy. |
59 |
> |
60 |
> You could guess the AU size by writting blocks of RU size from the start of |
61 |
> the card and timing it. Every time you hit the AU boundary there will be a |
62 |
> longer delay. |
63 |
> |
64 |
> For more details see the SD specification (chapter 4.13). |
65 |
> |
66 |
> https://www.sdcard.org/downloads/pls/ |
67 |
> |
68 |
> They also have formatter tools for Windows and OSX. I tried the Windows |
69 |
> version years ago but had problems with it (can't remember what). |
70 |
|
71 |
Excellent information Fernando, thank you! |
72 |
|
73 |
So there is no tool for me to use to read the AU/RU on the chip? |
74 |
|
75 |
-- |
76 |
Regards, |
77 |
Mick |