Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Richard Fish <bigfish@××××××××××.org>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Grrr: gentoo form of dependency hell was: [Bug 129864]
Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 02:14:33
Message-Id: 7573e9640605131905o44f4a313pf06d4a006872666e@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] Grrr: gentoo form of dependency hell was: [Bug 129864] by Kevin O'Gorman
1 On 5/13/06, Kevin O'Gorman <kogorman@×××××.com> wrote:
2 > I really need this thing. I want it to be stable. But sorry, the old one
3 > can't be
4 > built any more, and the new one is masked. So I'm just out of luck.
5
6 <snip>
7
8 > > Clear-Text:
9 > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129864
10 > > Secure: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129864
11
12 Do you need it with tcl/tk support? If not, add "net-misc/suite3270
13 -tcltk" to /etc/portage/package.use and build it without.
14
15 And it is only keyword masked, so unmasking should be a pretty simple
16 and safe operation. Just add one of the following to
17 /etc/portage/package.keywords:
18
19 =net-misc/suite3270-3.3.4_p6 ~x86
20 =net-misc/suite3270-3.3.2_p1 ~x86
21 net-misc/suite3270 ~x86
22
23 Looking at the dependancy list in the 3.3.2 and 3.3.4 ebuilds, you
24 should not need ~x86 for anything else.
25
26 -Richard
27
28 --
29 gentoo-user@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Grrr: gentoo form of dependency hell was: [Bug 129864] Kevin O'Gorman <kogorman@×××××.com>