| 1 |
On 2016-05-11, Jonathan Callen <jcallen@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> Looking further at the ebuilds in question, it appears that if you wish |
| 4 |
> to have older versions of GCC installed with >=gcc-4.9, you need to have |
| 5 |
> USE=multislot on the *newer* versions of gcc (this USE=multislot doesn't |
| 6 |
> appear to be completely broken like the old USE=multislot was; now the |
| 7 |
> SLOTs are constant with respect to USE). |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
So slots no longer "just work" like they have for the past 15 years? |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
You now have to explicitly request installation in a slot by setting |
| 12 |
the multislot flag? |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Did I miss an eselect news warning about this? |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Is this true for all packages that were previously installed in slots, |
| 17 |
or have gcc and a select few been chosen specially for this breakage? |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
Grant Edwards grant.b.edwards Yow! I feel like I'm |
| 21 |
at in a Toilet Bowl with a |
| 22 |
gmail.com thumbtack in my forehead!! |
Archives