| 1 |
On Sunday 14 September 2008, David Leverton wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sunday 14 September 2008 22:38:42 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: |
| 3 |
> > yeah, sure. But no. Not lies. Or why were this guys forcefully retired? |
| 4 |
> > For their behaviour. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> No, to prevent Gentoo from losing a major sponsor. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> > Also: |
| 9 |
> > http://r0bertz.blogspot.com/2007/01/be-careful-when-you-are-on-paludis.ht |
| 10 |
> >ml |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Idiot does something idiotic and is called "idiot". Film at 11. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
he asked for a feature. Nothing else. Oh, wait, that is r0bertz - a fellow |
| 15 |
dev! |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> > > > and that was an official api? Yes? No? |
| 19 |
> > > |
| 20 |
> > > Irrelevant. |
| 21 |
> > |
| 22 |
> > no, not irrelevant but the beef of the story. |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> So your bureaucratic little rules about what's "official" and what isn't |
| 25 |
> are more important than what's actually useful? |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
lets see - an overlay is setup to develop and test ebuilds for KDE4 that |
| 28 |
should some day go into the tree. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
Deciding to use a feature that the official pm does not provide - and only one |
| 31 |
of the three makes the 'testing' part and 'for the tree' pretty superfluos. |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
> > no, it just makes you think if you should really use a piece of software |
| 34 |
> > whose makers will insult and ridicule you. |
| 35 |
> |
| 36 |
> If anyone likes to "insult and ridicule" Paludis users, it's not the |
| 37 |
> Paludis developers. |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
no, they like to insult everybody no matter what they use - right? |
Archives