| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Neil Bothwick wrote: |
| 5 |
> On Thu, 27 Jul 2006 12:08:41 +0200, Hans-Werner Hilse wrote: |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
>> I'm seeing the same. The amount of missing mails doesn't qualify for |
| 8 |
>> "lots", but I'm missing some. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
When several mails on a daily basis continue to "go missing", over a |
| 11 |
period of weeks, I call that lots. If each mail missing was a nut or |
| 12 |
bolt used to put together your car (or in my case archive them |
| 13 |
accordingly in a database), it becomes "lots" ;-) |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
> I see the same. I've seen quite a few replies to mails I never received. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Yes, this is what first caught my eye, the secondly being the software I |
| 18 |
wrote not positively finding threads, and now and then not finding the |
| 19 |
first message to the new thread (as Neil writes above). |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
The strange thing is gmane seems to be receiving all the mail, or at |
| 22 |
least 99% of it ~ so why gmane and not us? |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 28 |
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (MingW32) |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
iD8DBQFEyKMWCt0ZF9kLPvYRAiPJAKCHutev8Jxbw4ffV+GlEGtNe/81mACfYRZt |
| 31 |
b3t+Rn8g+k+aAdrNnYxIGRA= |
| 32 |
=3rtx |
| 33 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 34 |
-- |
| 35 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives