Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: "Andrés Becerra Sandoval" <andres.becerra@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Heads Up - net-misc/netifrc-0.5.0
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 13:51:49
Message-Id: CACSNh6NBCM8Gp44+a9UeSACfOzCaM2jA3EjDZYRfVcgrzyrhAQ@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Heads Up - net-misc/netifrc-0.5.0 by Peter Humphrey
1 2016-10-26 3:58 GMT-05:00 Peter Humphrey <peter@××××××××××××.uk>:
2
3 > On Wednesday 26 Oct 2016 01:26:37 Holger Hoffstätte wrote:
4 > > On Wed, 26 Oct 2016 07:32:17 +0800, Bill Kenworthy wrote:
5 > > > On 26/10/16 07:16, Peter Humphrey wrote:
6 > > >> On Tuesday 25 Oct 2016 13:49:44 Andrés Becerra Sandoval wrote:
7 > > >>> Hello,
8 > > >>>
9 > > >>> net-misc/netifrc-0.5.0 was installed today as part of my upgrade and
10 > > >>> the
11 > > >>> network (static) was broken. I had to mask the package and go back
12 > to
13 > > >>> 0.4.0 to fix it!
14 > > >>
15 > > >> Likewise here.
16 > > >
17 > > > uhmm, "broken" can mean many things, so can you be more specific?
18 > >
19 > > Probably referring to https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=598078
20 >
21 > That's the one.
22 >
23 > --
24 > Rgds
25 > Peter
26 >
27 >
28 ​Yes, that's the problem, I am glad it is already reported ​
29
30
31 --
32 Andrés