Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Peter Humphrey <peter@××××××××××××.uk>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] CMYK comparison to sRGB between platforms
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2015 10:51:10
Message-Id: 3224848.3RJHUQD5Ai@wstn
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] CMYK comparison to sRGB between platforms by Mick
1 On Sunday 27 September 2015 10:47:51 Mick wrote:
2 > On Sunday 27 Sep 2015 09:58:43 Peter Humphrey wrote:
3 > > I do have the two .icc files in .local/share/icc:
4 > >
5 > > $ ls -l .local/share/icc
6 > > total 28K
7 > > -rw-r--r-- 1 prh prh 1.2K Sep 9 16:51
8 > > edid-fbec4f9c1804ea718b6e1b585fc234ad.icc -rw-rw-r-- 1 prh prh 21K Sep 10
9 > > 10:41 GCM - Samsung - SMS27A350H - unknown (2015-09-10) [04-58-44].icc
10 > >
11 > > /usr/bin/file shows them both as "ColorSync ICC Profile". I don't know why
12 > > there are two, nor why they have such different sizes.
13 >
14 > I'm guessing that the 'edid-fbec4f9c1804ea718b6e1b585fc234ad.icc' was
15 > extracted from your monitor's EEPROM chip through the i2c bus and saved on
16 > disk by the LiveCD you ran, but the 'GCM - Samsung - SMS27A350H - unknown
17 > (2015-09-10) [04-58-44].icc' was generated by the colorimeter during your
18 > calibration exercise.
19 >
20 > I'm also guessing that the smaller size of the first file is because your
21 > monitor's EDID is of an earlier version, e.g. EDID-v1.1 or some such, which
22 > used to only contain a 128-byte data structure. I seem to recall that very
23 > early EDID versions didn't even contain colospace and Gamma data, but may be
24 > wrong.
25
26 I've just visited the Taxi site you mentioned to see what's there for my
27 monitor. Nothing! So I tried uploading my ColorHug data. The page asked for a
28 metadata file and a profile data file, from which I supposed that my smaller file
29 is metadata about the content of the larger one. But when I tried to upload
30 the two files on that assumption I got a server error. Same when I tried them
31 the other way round.
32
33 Looking at the larger file with less, I find eight lines of binary data at the
34 head followed by 400-odd lines of legible textual data. Interesting stuff,
35 though of course I don't know what to do with it myself.
36
37 > These are [Mick's] sizes :
38 >
39 > ls -n ~/.local/share/color/icc/devices/Display/
40 > total 800
41 > -rw-r--r-- 1 1001 1001 1944 Sep 18 18:16 ACI ASUS VS239
42 > EALMTF200702_edid.icc
43 > -rw-r--r-- 1 1001 1001 2016 Sep 18 18:16 Dell Computer DELL ST2320L
44 > MP82K0712EJL_edid.icc
45 > -rw-r--r-- 1 1001 1001 20884 Sep 18 19:01 P2311H 2012-06-20 2.2 MQ-HQ
46 > 3xCurve+MTX.icc
47 > -rw-r--r-- 1 1001 1001 783804 Sep 18 19:02 PA248 2015-04-18 S
48 XYZLUT+MTX.icc
49 >
50 > The first two are from the monitors' EDID content, the latter are the
51 > profiles I downloaded from the Taxi DB. Some of these contributors'
52 > profiles were created with spyder or other expensive colorimeters, so I am
53 > surmising that they capture more data points and contain more information,
54 > than the manufacturers EDID which is primarily contains other than
55 > colorspace and Gamma data.
56
57 Lucky you! As I said, my monitor hasn't made it into the database yet. And it
58 seems I can't contribute to it either.
59
60 --
61 Rgds
62 Peter

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] CMYK comparison to sRGB between platforms Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com>